EduTECH - Ian Jukes on the Education in the Age of Disruptive Innovation


Change and what it means about you personally and professionally.

He wants to talk about change.

Disruptive innovation changes the we way see things and the way we do things.

Economy and our education - in Australia (and the West) there has been nearly a complete disappearance of the factory worker and the factory mindset. It is cheaper to make things elsewhere which has meant a vast loss of manufacturing jobs. This is a stealth trend. This is disruptive innovation. Blue collar jobs are location dependent. White collar jobs are not. They can be outsourced. Routine cognitive work can and will be outsourced to cheaper countries. ODesk coordinates these workers from around the world. ODesk takes screen shots every 5 minutes and keystrokes reporting on productivity from across the globe. This is the work market our young people are entering into. We are now seeing the company of one, the work goes to the worker. Part time and temporary work had become the new normal. Whether you are comfortable with it or not this is the new global workspace. Work can not only be outsourced it can be automated. Legal software, tax preparation is an example of automated software replacing a person and a job. If we look at current trends, people who need to be managed constantly will be unemployable. 

The new illiterates are those who are technologically illiterate. It is a disability. 

Learning and earning is from the neck up. Everything from the neck down is minimum wage - Bob Hughes 

The agricultural workforce is declining, the industrial workforce is declining. The non-location dependent service workforce is increasing, as is the creative workforce. Since personal computers have the trend has changed, the service workforce is decreasing, the creative workforce are still increasing.  This is because service class jobs are replaced by technology. Creative class jobs are facilitated by technology. 

We have a fundamental problem - our schools were designed for agricultural and manufacturing jobs and these jobs are disappearing. Traditional practices are still prevalent in schools but those students will not go into traditional jobs. Our students are still preparing students for the Industrial Age. 

I agree heartily. In fact this echoes much of what I shared in my talk about Realising the Future of NZ Education. Admittedly this is not a coincident as I have read and enjoyed much of his work and research. 


We live in an 'Hunger Games economy' - everyone for themselves. Our educational approach has to change to prepare our students for this world. Our students won't have 4-7 but 10-17 careers by the time they are 38. We need learners who will curate their own portfolios in preparation for curating their own careers and futures. 

Disruptive innovation had made a new division of labour. Those who succeed are those that can adapt swiftly. We all need to be lifelong learners so they won't be blindsided by disruptive innovation. 

Short life skills such as memorisation is not the key to success. Long life skills such as creativity, interpersonal skills, critical thinking and problem solving will be the key to success. 

If we are truly going to prepare the students for their future we need to change education. We have to prepare for them future and not just our past. We have to make fundamental change and we have to make the changes now. 

When the rate of change outside of the organisation is faster than the rate of change inside the organisation, the end is in sight.  - Jack Welch 

We can't just pretend that we need to make incremental change, it's time to redesign the education system from the ground up. This makes me particularly proud to be at Hobsonville Point Secondary School as I believe we are doing this.

1) Connectivity is transforming knowledge. We live in the age of infowhelm. 
2) Students are now our clients. They have many options for learning. 
3) Adaptive technology can replace much of what teachers do. Apps can't place good teachers.
4) Our students learn differently than we do.
5) For the digital generation the world is one great big social network.
6) Mobile devices will transform learning experience. 
7) Big data is here to stay. Radical personalisation of learning is on the way. 
8) The older generation don't get teaching and learning. 

Are we preparing them for their future or our past. 

The default future will happen regardless, you have a choice as to whether you will prepare your students for it. 

Are you will willing to make the necessary changes? Are we going to victims or survivors, or more importantly are we going to let our learners be victims or survivors. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The National, Act and NZ First Coalition and what it means for education

Image
Photo Source Yesterday saw the announcement of a new government which came with a raft of new policies and ministerial appointments. The Minister of Education, as was expected, is National MP Erica Stanford. More interestingly was the number of policies and priorities two parties who only collectively gained 15.5% of the votes managed to get across the line.  The common threads across both Act and NZ First included some good old-fashioned back-to-basics, a focus on compulsory attendance and cracking down on truancy, increased focus on academic achievement and shifting the fees-free policy from the first of uni to the last. To be fair, none of these represent much of a departure from what National was touting anyway.  The interesting and, at times, worrying changes suggest Luxon was willing to let both Act and NZ First foist their ideologies on innocent schools and students for the sake of a "strong and stable" government.  Unsurprisingly Act got Partnership Schools across the
Read more

National, Act and the age of standardisation in education

Image
Chris and David discussing the joy of testing. Whilst we are still awaiting the outcome of special votes, it is pretty safe to assume that we are staring down the barrel of a National / Act Party government that will be bringing a very distinct flavour to the education landscape. Below is an outline of what each party promised for education.  Front and centre is a focus on "back to basics" and what looks like a whole lot more standardisation (from both National and Act) and testing to ensure we are all "teaching the basics brilliantly". Those of us in schools know that standardisation isn't necessarily the answer and testing didn't seem to turn the dial in the past either. That is the trouble when policies are designed to satisfy parent voters who just want their kids back in school and succeeding.  In their 100-day plan, National is promising to do the following in the education space: Require primary and intermediate schools to teach one hour a day each of
Read more

Assessment in the Age of AI - Claire Amos

Image
Below are the slides I shared at NZQA's 'Assessment in the Age of AI' symposium.   This is my brief overview of how we are approaching AI at Albany Senior High School and some of the concerns and some of thoughts I have about the topic.  In short, I am worried we are so damn busy we aren't giving it the attention it needs. I also worry that leaders will try and ignore and/or attempt to ban and that this ignores the fact that Pandora's Box is well and truly opened and this thing is developing faster than we can imagine and is increasingly woven into platforms and tools we already use. We are sitting at a fork in the path where both options lead to a world fundamentally altered by AI and we need to choose whether to work with it or stick our heads in the sand. That decision is going to have a tangible impact on how well our young people are going to be equipped to thrive in the future.  We need to embrace AI, and approach it with curiosity, criticality and care.  One
Read more